Afghanistan And The ‘Zero Option’ : Chicago Tribune

DeM Banter:  Agree…and here’s to hoping it was merely a threat…and we won’t have to revisit in 5 years.

Chicago Tribune
July 13, 2013
Pg. 12

Why the U.S. should keep a hand in there

President Hamid Karzai’s erratic behavior has President Barack Obama considering a complete withdrawal of U.S. troops from Afghanistan after 2014.

The frustration with Karzai is understandable.

iStock Afghan mapLast month, peace talks between the U.S. and the Taliban collapsed before they even started. Karzai accused the U.S of trying to negotiate a separate peace with the Taliban and their enablers in Pakistan, leaving his government vulnerable to its foes. In retaliation, Karzai cut off negotiations with the U.S. over a security agreement that will govern American military forces after 2014.

And so, the White House signaled through aNew York Times story this week, the so-called “zero option” is gaining traction.

The U.S. recently turned over complete security control to Afghanistan forces and has a timetable for withdrawal of troops by the end of 2014. The expectation is that the U.S. would keep a modest force of 3,000 to 9,000 troops after that, focused on antiterror operations and support for Afghan security forces. Afghanistan will need international assistance to keep the Taliban at bay and deny a safe haven to al-Qaida.

But the U.S. won’t be willing to risk an extended presence if it doesn’t have an agreement with Afghanistan that legally protects U.S. soldiers. Without that agreement, the U.S. military will have to leave the country.

That’s what happened in Iraq in 2011. Iraqi lawmakers refused to provide U.S. troops with legal protection from Iraqi courts. American soldiers would have been vulnerable to arrest and punishment under Iraqi laws. The U.S. wouldn’t take that risk in Iraq, nor should it in Afghanistan.

Most likely, Obama has floated the zero option as a reminder (read: threat) to Karzai that he has an option: Embrace an international security presence beyond 2014 or watch his government fall to the Taliban.

Karzai shouldn’t require such reminders. Just hours after the peace talks collapsed in Qatar, Taliban fighters launched a high-profile assault on the presidential place in Kabul.

Yes, Karzai has a flair for the dramatic. He once threatened to join the Taliban himself. But he also has shown an instinct for survival. He’ll come around to a troop agreement.

After so many years of fighting, it’s easy to lose sight of just how much life has improved in Afghanistan.

“The country has undergone such extraordinary change since 9/11 that a return to the dark period of the Taliban is unfathomable,” Saad Mohseni, chairman of MOBY Group, Afghanistan’s largest media group, wrote in a Wall Street Journal oped.

One snapshot: There are more than 8 million children in Afghanistan’s schools now, including 2.6 million girls. In 2001, under Taliban rule, there were 900,000 boys and virtually no girls in school.

The U.S. and its allies have pledged to spend billions of dollars after 2014 to continue building Afghanistan’s security forces. In a 2012 NATO summit in Chicago, world leaders declared that “Afghanistan will not stand alone” after 2014.

More precisely, Afghanistan will not stand if it is alone.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: